Dr. David E. Lawler | 
2909 Buick Cadillac Blvd. | Bloomington, Indiana 47401
 | 812-339-4499

The Center for Sound Sleep

Ask Dr. Lawler

Dr. Lawler’s Blog


Oral Systemic Balance in the management of head and neck pain

February 21st, 2010 by dlawler


It is not uncommon for people with sleep-related breathing disorders to have a significant amount of head and neck pain. People with these combined problems, have a double whammy in getting good sleep. Not only are they fighting for air during sleep and sleeping fitfully because of difficulty breathing, they have the added burden of having their pain disturb their sleep as well.


Oral Systemic Balance, a therapy developed by Dr. Farrand Robson, has the ability to deal with both of the above issues at the same time. The patient featured below is a fibromyalgia sufferer. Most people with fibromyalgia sleep poorly for the reasons mentioned above. I am most grateful for her in allowing me to video her appointment at which we placed an Oral Systemic Balance orthotic on her lower teeth. Her consent in allowing this video to be shown on this website will hopefully help many people understand the tremendous amount of pain relief that can be accomplished with Oral Systemic Balance therapy.



Again, I want to express my appreciation for this patient’s willingness for this video to be shown and my gratitude to Dr. Robson for his guidance. I feel very strongly that his work is groundbreaking. For more information on this website about Oral Systemic Balance therapy, go here.

Snoring and pregnancy

January 18th, 2010 by dlawler


If you have looked at Featured Patient #108 you might get some idea of the impact that upper airway resistance syndrome has on women in pregnancy.  Snoring increases dramatically in pregnancy, peaking during the third trimester and gradually returning to “normal” levels after pregnancy as seen in the chart below:

 

 

 
As medical advisor to the Indiana Society of Sleep Professionals, I have contact with sleep labs all over the state of Indiana and I can assure you that it is a rare night when a woman in pregnancy is admitted into a sleep lab.  


I am in the process of conducting a clinical trial for a pilot study on the effect of oral appliance therapy on women in pregnancy who from upper airway resistance syndrome during the later stages of their pregnancy.  The following video is an interview done with a young mother who used an oral appliance in the later stages of her pregnancy to allow her to breathe better during sleep. It is my hope that the results obtained by this young woman and others like her in this study will draw attention to the tremendous need to focus on sleep-related breathing disorders and their treatment during pregnancy.


Featured Patient #109

January 11th, 2010 by dlawler


It is not necessary for sleep-related breathing disorders to have medical ramifications for them to be disruptive to people’s lives.  Featured Patient #109 came to us for help with her troublesome snoring which was preventing her husband from sleeping in the same room with her.

 

Snoring can cause significant relationship problems and has let to many a divorce.  The snorer is almost always unaware of their snoring unless told by a bed partner.  Bed partners can loose significant amounts of sleep as they suffer from “second hand snoring”.  When bed partners chose to sleep in a separate bedroom rather than deal with the snoring, feelings can be hurt.

 

Oral appliance therapy allowed Featured Patient #109 to sleep quietly.  We were pleased for her when she told us, “My husband and I can now sleep in the same bedroom!”

Featured Patient #108

January 4th, 2010 by dlawler


Women in the third trimester of pregnancy are particularly susceptible to sleep-related breathing disorders.  Studies show that during this time there is considerable upper airway narrowing due to the weight gain and edema that can accompany a pregnancy.  

 

Studies show that approximately 17% of non-pregnant women snore while as many as 28% of women in the third trimester of pregnancy report snoring.  Interestingly, 75% of women with pre-eclampsia report snoring!

 

Featured patient #108 came to our office for her regular dental examination during her third trimester.  When asked how she was sleeping, she replied that she was sleeping badly, snoring horribly and awakening in the morning feeling tired, groggy and in a bad mood.

 

An oral appliance was made to help open her airway during sleep.  The first morning after wearing her appliance, she left the following message on our answering machine, “This is wonderful!  I woke up in a great mood and not groggy at all!  By the way, my husband is very happy!”

Speaker at Wegmiller Auditorium at 7:00 p.m.

September 30th, 2009 by admin

Speaker at Wegmiller Auditorium at 7:00 p.m.

August 26th, 2009 by admin

Speaker at Wegmiller Auditorium at 7:00 p.m.

July 27th, 2009 by admin

Speaker at Wegmiller Auditorium at 7:00 p.m.

June 24th, 2009 by admin

Speaker at Wegmiller Auditorium at 7:00 p.m.

May 27th, 2009 by admin

Featured Patient #111

May 14th, 2009 by dlawler

 

 
Oral appliance therapy is normally a process.  In other words, when starting oral appliance therapy a very gentle mandibular advancement position is chosen in order for the patient to easily accommodate the appliance.  This is one of the things that makes oral appliance therapy so successful!  It is a very comfortable device to wear during sleep.  Usually, after the patient has had a week or so to get used to sleeping with the appliance, the appliance is adjusted to bring the mandible further forward.  However, some patients get a major amount of relief with the beginning position.  Patient #111 is such an example.  With only the starting position, she had in incredible amount of benefit in improved night-time oxygen levels.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As shown in the chart, her night time oxygen levels were dramatically and immediately improved.  Without the oral appliance, she spent 54 minutes with her oxygen levels below 90%.  With the oral appliance, she spent only 7 minutes with low oxygen levels.  We expect further improvements in her night time oxygen levels as her treatment progresses.

Featured Patient #110

May 3rd, 2009 by dlawler

 

Featured Patient #110

 

 

While everyone suffering from a sleep-related breathing disorder has some physical consequence to the repetitive interruption in the flow of life-giving oxygen, sometimes the effects have larger social consequences than others.  This patient, who could not tolerate CPAP experienced very significant daytime sleepiness from her disorder.  So why is this such a big deal?  She happens to be a school bus driver!  The level of daytime sleepiness she experienced placed her at the same risk of having a traffic accident as a drunk driver.

 

 

Oral appliance therapy completely resolved her daytime sleepiness and reduced it from a dangerously high of 16 on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale to a very normal 6.

Speaker at Wegmiller Auditorium at 7:00 p.m.

April 29th, 2009 by admin

Speaker at Wegmiller Auditorium at 7:00 p.m.

March 25th, 2009 by admin

Speaker at Wegmiller Auditorium at 7:00 p.m.

February 18th, 2009 by admin

Speaker at Wegmiller Auditorium at 7:00 p.m.

January 21st, 2009 by admin

Featured Patient #107

December 27th, 2008 by dlawler

 

Featured patient of the week #107 is a classic example of the difficulty that many patients have in finding out options for the management of their sleep apnea.  This patients is a physician who had been diagnosed with sleep apnea quite a few years ago and who had been prescribed CPAP therapy.  I have been very clear throughout this website that CPAP is a godsend for untold hundreds of thousands of sleep apnea patients.  However, there are huge numbers of patients that absolutely cannot tolerate CPAP.  

 

There is a belief in much of the medical community that if you merely educate the patient about the need for therapy and try enough different CPAP masks, that the patient will soon tolerate CPAP.  This physician needed no education about the need for his therapy.  As a doctor, he well knew the danger of sleep apnea coupled with his heart condition.  He tried every possible CPAP combination before abandoning that treatment.  Luckily he heard my interview on “Sound Medicine“, the National Public Radio program sponsored by the Indiana University School of Medicine and quickly scheduled an appointment.  Patients do best in dealing with any medical condition when they have information about the options for the management of their disease!

 

 

The photo at right shows Patient #107’s dental condition showing the deep overbite so common in many patients with sleep apnea.  This dental condition represents less room for the tongue making it easier for the tongue to block the airway during sleep with the muscles in the base of the tongue are relaxed.

 

 

 

Sleep apnea puts a great deal of stress on the cardiovascular system, making this disorder particularly important to manage with Patient # 107.  Shown below is a chart documenting the tremendous improvement is maintaining appropriate oxygen levels throughout the night that were obtained with oral appliance therapy use in this patient.  Before using oral appliance therapy, this patient 68 times during the night when his oxygen levels dropped between 4 and 9% and 24 times when O2 levels dropped between 10 and 20%, a significant stress on the heart!  Using his oral appliance no significant oxygen desaturations were noted.

Featured Patient #106

December 21st, 2008 by dlawler

 

Featured patient is a wonderful example of blending therapies that, by themselves, would not provide optimum results.  This patient is also an example that initial diagnostic tests may not give the correct information.

 

This patient came to see us for help with his “horrible snoring”.  He frequently traveled with friends and no one ever wanted to share a room with him.  He had recently had a sleep study at a local hospital and received the following diagnosis, “The patient was a very loud snorer……..Mildly abnormal sleep apnea with no desaturation and preservation of REM sleep.  The patient does not require treatment.”

 

Surprisingly, this diagnosis was given despite the patient’s uncontrolled blood pressure of 154/95 while being on blood pressure medication  (those people with drug resistant hypertension have an 80% chance of having obstructive sleep apnea).  This patient had worked with his primary care physician for some time in an unsuccessful attempt to get his blood pressure under control.  In addition to his concern about his uncontrolled blood pressure, this patient reported a significant amount of daytime sleepiness with an Epworth Sleepiness score of 16.

 

Given the significant daytime sleepiness as well as the presence of drug resistant hypertension, a Watch PAT home sleep study was ordered.  The sleep data gathered from this report suggested the presence of severe sleep apnea.  Even though the diagnosis from the hospital sleep study indicated that no treatment was needed, the wording “mildly abnormal sleep apnea” provided the opening for this patient’s medical insurance company to approve treatment.  Oral appliance therapy was chosen by this patient because he regarded himself as being “severely claustrophobic” and knew he could not tolerate a CPAP mask.

 

Oral appliance therapy provided patient #106 immediate relief from much of his daytime sleepiness, taking Epworth score from 16 to a more normal 9. However, over the first several months of treatment there was no change in his drug resistant hypertension.  A follow-up home study to assess treatment effectiveness indicated that he was obtaining a significant increase of REM sleep, indicating a much more restful sleep.  In addition, the number of hourly respiratory events had been dramatically reduced but not eliminated.  

 

This situation shows clearly the disadvantage of oral appliance therapy.  CPAP therapy when used full time would almost always completely eliminate any residual respiratory events while oral appliance will not always completely normalize sleep breathing as in this case.  However, for those patients who will not or cannot wear CPAP full time, oral appliance therapy can usually accomplish identical or better results.  For this patient, a comparison between weekly unmanaged respiratory events with oral appliance therapy and for average CPAP compliance is shown in the chart below.

 

 

This chart shows clearly that oral appliance therapy used in this patient exceeds the benefits that he would derive from CPAP used with average compliance.

 

However, even though patient #106 was doing better with oral appliance therapy than CPAP used with average compliance, it was reasoned that the remaining unmanaged respiratory events were contributing to his still uncontrolled hypertension.  Patient #106 was still unwilling to use CPAP due to his claustrophobia but was willing to consider surgery.  Patient #106 was sent to a local ears, nose and throat physician for a consultation.  When presented with the surgical options this patient decided against surgery.

 

This decision to avoid surgery allowed us to try again to get patient #106 to consider CPAP.  It was decided to deal with his feelings of claustrophobia by combining the oral appliance with a CPAP nasal interface as shown below:

 

 

 

 

In this photo, the upper part of the oral appliance is shown joined to the CPAP nasal pillow.  When worn with the lower part of the oral appliance, the patient receives the benefits of BOTH therapies at the same time.  The oral appliance moves the lower jaw and tongue base forward which helps lower CPAP air pressure necessary to eliminate the remaining airway obstructions.  In addition, since the CPAP nasal pillow is joined firmly to the oral appliance there is no need for head straps and the patient is free to turn from side to side during sleep without the mask being pulled away from the face causing sleep disturbing air leaks.

 

Patient #106 was seen for follow-up a month after joining the oral appliance and CPAP together.  Happily, his previously uncontrolled hypertension was now completely under control and his primary care physician was in the process of reducing the medication.  In addition the CPAP compliance card was downloaded and it was seen that patient #106 was easily able to wear his hybrid PAP full time.

Featured Patient #105

December 14th, 2008 by dlawler

 

Patient #105 demonstrates the enhanced level of health that results when a patient has their sleep breathing more normalized.  Our initial home sleep monitoring showed him with an oxygen desaturation index of 23, a significant amount of sleep apnea.  Initially, his daytime sleepiness was very significant with an Epworth Sleepiness Scale number at 15.  This level of daytime sleepiness is significant enough to put him and others at severe risk if he were to drive a motor vehicle a significant distance.  In addition, his fatigue level as measured by the Fatigue Severity Scale was 40, indicating a high level of fatigue. 

 

 

Six months later, his sleep breathing was almost normalized with his oxygen desaturation index at 7, his Epworth score was a normal 4 and his daytime fatigue score a greatly improved 25.  During this time he had lost 21 pounds with his neck size has decreasing from 17″ to 16.25″.  

 

Patient #105 is an example of someone who was too fatigued to exercise and, yet, was unable to tolerate CPAP therapy.  However, he was easily able to use an oral appliance to help manage his problem.  Once he started using his oral appliance, he immediately started feeling better.  This renewed feeling of alertness and energy inspired him to start light exercise.  With the light exercise came the weight loss.  With the weight loss, came the reduction in neck size.  With less fatty tissue in the neck, more room was available for the upper airway.  

 

It is impossible to diminish the importance of a good night’s sleep!

Featured Patient #104

December 7th, 2008 by dlawler

Featured patient #104 came with her husband to our office for a consultation regarding her snoring which was interfering with her husband’s sleep. She had been to see an ENT physician who had referred her to the hospital’s sleep lab to rule out sleep apnea.  The result of the sleep study indicated “loud snoring but otherwise unremarkable polysomnography”.  In other words, this was medical terminology for “Other than the fact that you snore loudly, you don’t have a problem.” In further consultation with the ENT, she had ruled out a surgical approach to snoring relief.

 

At the initial consultation, patient #104 denied any daytime sleepiness or fatigue.  However, when asked how she felt when she awakened in the morning, she replied, “Waking up is hell.”  Her husband indicated that once she had her shower, she was fine for the rest of the day, but that he often had to go the bedroom several times to get her out of bed.

 

Since it had been several years since she had her sleep study, we did a home sleep study to verify that she did not have obstructive sleep apnea.  The result of the home sleep test agreed with the hospital test, but indicated a significant amount of upper airway resistance which is often overlooked by hospital sleep evaluations.

 

An oral appliance was fabricated for patient #104 and her immediate response at our follow up appointment was “Waking up is wonderful”  I no longer hit the snooze alarm 3-4 times before getting up.”  Follow up home sleep evaluation revealed that her pulse rate during sleep dropped 7 beats per minute with her oral appliance in place indicating a much more restful sleep.  In addition the Watch PAT home sleep monitor indicated a dramatic increase in REM sleep from a sub-normal 10% to 30%.

Featured Patient #103

November 29th, 2008 by dlawler

 

 


 

Patient #103 was referred to our office by her physician.  She was suffering from obstructive sleep apnea.  In addition she had been diagnosed with fibromyalgia and was taking Lyrica 3 times a day to help manage the symptoms.  She complained of severe daytime sleepiness which forced her to take Provigil, an alerting medication, since her job required her to drive long distances each day.  She had attempted CPAP to manage her obstructive sleep apnea, but was not able to tolerate the therapy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

An oral examination revealed a dental condition that predisposes people to having obstructive sleep apnea.  As shown in the photo, this patient has a significant overbite.  This means that her mandible did not fully develop into its normal position in the skull.  Because of this, the tongue base is positioned too far back in the throat and sleep apnea easily results.

 

 

Patient #103 was fitted with an oral appliance and immediately noticed a relief of her symptoms of severe daytime sleepiness.  In addition, she also noticed that her symptoms of fibromyalgia were significantly reduced.  As a result, she was able to significantly reduce her Lyrica dosage.

 

Before and after home sleep monitoring with the Watch PAT showed that her sleeping pulse rate dropped by 10 beats a minute using her oral appliance!  This indicates a much more restful sleep.  In addition her nightly percentage of REM sleep increased from a below normal 10% to a normal 20%.

 

In her words, Featured Patient #103 said: “I feel 100% better!”